Early Catalan OV Sequences: Empirical Evidence for the Poverty of Stimulus Argument*
نویسندگان
چکیده
After all the criticism Pullum and Scholz (2002a) have received, the best way of contributing something new to the debate of the Poverty of Stimulus (POS) argument and linguistic nativism was to discuss some empirical evidence of the kind these authors claim to be missing in the generative literature. In this paper, I explore the idea that, as suggested by other authors (Rosselló, Llinàs and Bel, in press), OV sequences occurring with telic verbs in early Catalan (Llinàs-Grau 1998; Llinàs-Grau and Coll-Alfonso 2001) constitute robust evidence for the POS argument. OV sequences do not have an observable adult counterpart. Yet, they happen to be systematically produced around 2 years of age, as confirmed by the data of four Catalan children which parallel other existing data on the same issue. The adult input has also been analysed to see to what extent OV sequences could be claimed to be inexistent in the data the children were exposed to.
منابع مشابه
Establishing an Argument-Based Validity Approach for a Low-Stake Test of Collocational Behavior
Most of the validation studies conducted across varying test application contexts are usually framed within the traditional conceptualization of validity and therefore lack a comprehensive framework to focus on test score interpretations and test score use. This study aimed at developing and validating a collocational behavior test (CBT), drawing on Kane's argument-based approach to validity. F...
متن کاملPoverty of the Stimulus Arguments in Phonology
Recent discussions of Chomsky's poverty of the stimulus argument have focused on the empirical side of the argument to the exclusion of its conceptual and philosophical foundations in the general problem of induction (Hume, Goodman, etc.). Moreover, it has been claimed that there are no poverty of the stimulus arguments in phonology. Against these claims this article offers an example of a phon...
متن کاملSearching for arguments to support linguistic nativism1
This article is a reply to the foregoing responses to our Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments (Pullum and Scholz, this special volume, hereafter EASPA). We Þrst address certain philosophical themes that cut across all six responses.We correct the impression held by Lasnik andUriagereka (L&U) and Crain and Pietroski (C&P) that EASPA owes the reader an alternative theory of langu...
متن کاملPoverty as a cause and consequence of Ill health
Background and aims: Poverty is a multidimensional phenomenon that can be defined in both economic and social terms. The paper attempts to review the existing evidence to understand the relation between poverty and ill health in the context of the limited conceptual and operational definitions of these terms. The paper uses two of Hills criteria- reversibility and dose response relationship to ...
متن کامل3urylqjjsryhuwlhvvriiwkhhvwlpxoxvvzurqj $$frpsxwdwlrqdoodqggfrusxvedvhggfdvhhlqqsrlqwww
The Argument from the Poverty of the Stimulus (APS) still dominates a substantial part of the research in theoretical linguistics. While in generative approaches, the APS provides the foundation of the innateness hypothesis; in other paradigms (usage-based, interactionist, cognitivist) the argument is central because it is argued against it. Poverty of the stimulus arguments are indeed theoreti...
متن کامل